Identifying acceptable standards under UK SORA from SAIL 3 onwards: BSI Flex 1906 as your Guide
- Anne-Lise Scaillierez
- 1 day ago
- 2 min read
With the UK SORA (Specific Operations Risk Assessment) officially in force since 23 April 2025, operators now have a new, structured Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) to Article 11 of UK Regulation (EU) 2019/947, which governs “Rules for conducting an operational risk assessment.”
One of the questions that arises from UK SORA is:
👉 When the UK SORA methodology calls for the use of a standard or other Means of Compliance (MoC) acceptable to the CAA—which standards or MoCs is the methodology referring to?
The answer isn’t straightforward. The body of standards specifically tailored for uncrewed systems is still emerging. While there’s a wealth of existing standards developed for crewed aviation, identifying which ones are suitable and proportionate for uncrewed operations is a real challenge.
Enter BSI Flex 1906
BSI Flex 1906 was developed to help navigate this exact complexity.
Its purpose is to map existing standards and MoCs to the UK SORA requirements, up to SAIL3.
The work builds on technical assessments already performed under Project SHEPHERD (2021–2024) in Europe, and also considers MoCs developed by EASA where relevant to the UK context.
Scope of BSI Flex 1906
BSI Flex 1906 focuses on those UK SORA elements where a standard or MoC is explicitly referenced as a requirement. It examines whether appropriate, existing standards or MoCs are available and applicable.
Here’s a snapshot of key findings:
UK SORA item | CAA ref code | Level of SAIL/robustness | Are there applicable existing standards or MoC? |
OSO 2 UAS Manufactured by competent entity | OSO2 LA | Sail 3 and above | ❌No |
OSO 3 UAS maintained by competent entity | OSO3 C1 MA | Sail 3 and above | ⚠️Partially |
OSO 8 Operational procedures are defined | OSO8 MA | Sail 3 and above | ✅ Yes/Partially |
OSO 16 Multi Crew Coordination | OSO16C1 MA | Sail 3 and above | ❌No |
Containment | COT C4 MI | Medium or high robustness | ✅ Yes |
Containment(tether) | COT C2 MA | Medium or high robustness | ❌No |
M2 Effects of UA impact dynamics | M2C2 MA | Medium or high robustness | ⚠️Partially |
M2 Effects of UA impact dynamics | M2C1 HA | High robustness | ⚠️Partially |
FTB Functional Test-bed |
| General | ❌No |
Where an existing standard is cited but wasn’t originally developed for uncrewed aviation, it encourages critical thinking: Is it proportionate? Is it applicable?
Remember: the development of standards for uncrewed systems is still in its early stages. BSI Flex 1906 is one of the first tools designed to bridge the gap.
The BSI Flex 1906 technical author was Anthony Venetz acting on behalf the British Standards Institute. The work was supported and funded by UK Research and Innovation UKRI through UKRI Future of Flight Challenge.
Anne-Lise Scaillierez was a member of BSI Flex 1906 Advisory Board, representing ARPAS-UK.